EOT Claims &
Delay Analysis
Win every Extension of Time claim.
Supports 5 delay analysis methodologies — TIA, Windows Analysis, Collapsed As-Built, As-Planned vs As-Built, and 4 concurrent-delay approaches — plus FIDIC/NEC/JCT notice tracking, for submitting, defending, and winning Extension of Time claims.
Claims Register
| Ref | Title | Method | Days | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EOT-001 | Late Site Access | TIA | 28d | Approved |
| EOT-002 | Ground Conditions | TIA | 42d | Under Review |
| EOT-004 | Concurrent Delay | WINDOWS | 21d | Disputed |
| EOT-007 | Permit Delay | TIA | 22d | Submitted |
Delay Analysis Methods
Time Impact Analysis
Inserts delay fragnet into baseline schedule.
Best for: FIDIC · DAB · Arbitration
Sub-Clause 20.1
3d left
Compensation event notice
18d left
Delay notice
32d left
Which method fits your claim
| Method | Best For | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time Impact Analysis (TIA) | Contemporaneous, prospective delay analysis | Inserts delay fragnets into your baseline schedule and calculates the time impact on the completion date. |
| Windows Analysis | Multiple concurrent delays across a long programme | Divides the project into time windows and analyses the critical path within each period. |
| Collapsed As-Built (CAB) | Projects where the baseline was poorly maintained | Removes delay events from the as-built programme to produce a but-for schedule. |
| As-Planned vs As-Built | Low-value claims and preliminary assessments | A simple planned vs actual comparison — quick and inexpensive. |
| Concurrent Delay Calculator | Apportioning overlapping delay events | Analyses overlapping delays using SCL Protocol, Malmaison, FIDIC 8.5 Apportionment, or Dominant Cause methodology. |
Everything included
Claims Register
Full CRUD claims register with reference numbers, status tracking, days claimed vs approved, ownership, and prolongation cost.
Time Impact Analysis (TIA)
Insert delay fragnets into your baseline schedule and calculate the time impact on the completion date. Gold standard methodology.
Windows Analysis
Divide the project into time windows and analyse the critical path within each period. Best for multiple concurrent delays.
Collapsed As-Built (CAB)
Remove delay events from the as-built programme to produce a but-for schedule. Used when baseline was poorly maintained.
As-Planned vs As-Built
Simple planned vs actual comparison for low-value claims and preliminary assessments. Quick and inexpensive.
Concurrent Delay Calculator
Analyse overlapping delays using SCL Protocol, Malmaison, FIDIC 8.5 Apportionment, or Dominant Cause methodology.
Notice Tracker
FIDIC 28-day, plus NEC and JCT notice requirements — countdown timers for every contractual notice deadline with overdue alerts.
Dispute Risk Score
Weighted 0-100 risk score across 6 factors: concurrency, float ownership, notice compliance, documentation, CP linkage, quantum.
EOT Timeline
Gantt-style visual of all claims on a timeline with zoom, filter by owner/status, and hover tooltips showing full claim details.
Entitlement Analyzer
Float ownership breakdown showing employer, contractor, neutral, and concurrent delay days with percentage apportionment.
New Claim Wizard
3-step guided claim creation with validation, auto date calculation, method selection, and quantum preview.
CSV Export
Export the full claims register to CSV for use in Excel, legal submissions, or handover to claims consultants.
Why teams choose this
- Never miss a FIDIC 28-day notice deadline — the notice tracker fires email and push alerts automatically
- Prove critical path causation with TIA methodology — widely used in FIDIC delay analysis
- Quantify concurrent delay entitlement using the correct legal methodology for your contract and jurisdiction
- Build a contemporaneous claims register from day one — not scrambling to reconstruct it during a dispute
- The dispute risk score tells you where your claim is weak before you submit it — fix the gaps first
- Export forensic-quality delay analysis directly from P6 data — no separate specialist software needed
Who uses this
Contract Administrator
Logs every delay event in the claims register the day it occurs. Uses the notice tracker to ensure Sub-Clause 20.1 notices go out within the 28-day window every time.
Claims Consultant
Uses the TIA methodology tool to build the delay narrative and the concurrent delay calculator to address the Engineer's concurrency arguments before the DAB hearing.
Commercial Manager
Monitors the dispute risk score weekly. When it rises above 60, reviews the weak factors and commissions additional documentation to strengthen the claim.
Never lose another EOT claim
Start tracking delay events from day one. Build a contemporaneous claims register that holds up in adjudication, arbitration, and litigation.